S484 - Clarify Tourism-Related Expenditures. (SL 2026-15)
Session Year 2024
This legislation was in response to Costanzo v. Currituck County, a North Carolina Supreme Court case issued on May 22, 2026, in which a group of vacation rental property owners, who collect and remit occupancy taxes, challenged the County's use of funds for public safety services arguing that those services are not "tourism‑related expenditures." The Court ultimately ruled in favor of the County, in large part because the local act deferred to the judgment of the Board of Commissioners in determining what constitutes a tourism‑related expenditure. Moreover, the Court found the Commissioners' reasoning sound and in good faith because seasonal increases in tourists require additional public safety services and because tourists tend to avoid visiting areas that are not perceived to be safe. This legislation effectively overrules the opinion, at least with respect to Currituck County. However, consistent with the exception for explicit authorization, S.L. 2026‑7 modifies Currituck County's local act to explicitly allow it to use a portion of occupancy tax proceeds for certain public safety services.
This act became law June 22, 2026, and applies to the expenditure of occupancy tax proceeds collected on or after that date.
Additional Information: